A recent cancellation poses a challenge to Princeton’s newfound commitment to free speech.

Israel’s precision attack conforms to the demands of just-war theory and the laws of armed conflict.

The Supreme Court's approach to religious freedom is consonant with the paradigm that guided American jurisprudence through most of our history.

Strip away Mark Tushnet's dramatism and you are left with the oldest trick in the political demagogue’s book.

How far does the Supreme Court go in abolishing affirmative action in Students For Fair Admissions?

The argument made recently by Kim Forde-Mazrui may not be in good faith, but it does raise important questions about the meaning of the Constitution.

Religious and moral formation is part of Yeshiva University's educational mission.

Conservatives should stop guffawing at gender ideology, and make serious arguments instead.

The Supreme Court has embraced pluralism over militant secularism.

Cancel culture is directed not at Russia the violent invader, but at people who have been made into avatars for Russianism.

If anti-CRT laws are overly vague, the fault lies with CRT's proponents, who have not been forthcoming about their views or their educational agenda.

The more positively we spin disruption, the more likely we are to induce or prolong it so as to make it a launching point for social change.

Instead of preparing future leaders to be free and responsible citizens, our elite institutions infantilize them.

A much-heralded study is extremely limited and disconnected from basic income’s real-world implementation.

The father of “fusionism” still has much to teach conservatives entering the wilderness.

The claim that the United States is baked through with oppression always looks to origins, and this takes us down a dangerous path.